The crisis of the Islamic Republic, whether inside Iran or in the international sphere, is not caused by the wrong decisions of its politicians, groups that benefit from it, or its political factions; The crises of the Islamic Republic are essential, flowing from its existence and what it is they become Many western politicians and even some Iranian political activists have not yet understood that the Islamic Republic is not a government, but an anti-government. The state, in the modern sense, is an institution for the protection of the territory, the security of the citizens, the legitimate monopoly Violence and representation are national interests; However, the Islamic Republic has systematically completely destroyed these functions or put them at the service of a transnational and ideological project. The birth of the modern nation state is the result of modernity and accepting its requirements. However, the Islamist rebellion of 1957 was not a rebellion against the previous government, but against modernity itself and its necessity - the nation state. The Islamist movement of 57 is a regressive movement that has replaced the nation-state of Iran with the caliphate-ummah, and its ultimate goal is not profit. National, but the expansion of political Islam in the world. In this logic, Iran and the Iranian people are not the goal of politics, but the fuel of the project. The reason for the existence of the Islamic Republic is not to secure national interests, but to continue the endless war with modernity, the nation state and the world order. The issue is not that the Islamic Republic "wants or does not want" to be a normal actor in the international sphere, the issue is that being normal and modern is in conflict with the existence and what the Islamic Republic is.
The occasional diplomatic moves of the Islamic Republic are not a sign of a change in nature, but temporary tactics in its war of attrition with the world order. Also, the West, because it looks at the modernity of the Islamic Republic, mistakenly thinks that It is with a nation-state similar to itself; A government that turns on the heels of national interests and negotiates in its direction. The West's misunderstanding of the issue makes it think that by threatening Iran's national interests, it can gain concessions from the Islamic Republic take But the concept of government, nation, and national interests did not come about through diplomatic negotiations; These are the constructions of the Enlightenment era and the birth of the modern world. A structure that openly, both in discourse and in practice, opposes itself to the world Modern has defined, in principle, it does not seek national interests, nor is it even able to recognize it. The massacre in January and the shelling of thousands of Iranian protesting citizens is an unmistakable proof of the claim that the mullahs' regime is as hostile to the Iranian nation as it is to the Iranian people. the west
For many years, Jinnah, the so-called reformer of the Islamic Republic, sold this dream to the West that if the Islamic Republic finds a place in the international economy, economic development will automatically end revolutionary radicalism. Eventually, willy-nilly, it will become a normal government. This cognitive error came from the lack of understanding of the fundamental opposition of the Islamic Republic to modernity and the nation state. They make a wrong comparison between the Islamic revolution and classical revolutions such as the national revolution France predicted that the Islamic Revolution would finally enter the Thermidor period, that is, the decline of revolutionary radicalism. All the governments negotiating with the Islamic Republic in 2015 signed the JCPOA with such an optimistic view They did, and in response, today they are facing the expansion of a secret nuclear program and an amazing stockpile of suicide missiles and drones. To end this costly and dangerous cycle, first of all, the West must understand this issue in order to only The possible solution is: negotiation is nothing more than a mirage, and there is no other way than to destroy this force of anti-modernity and anti-world order. Other than this way, all the reactions of the West to the Islamic Republic are only postponing the confrontation until tomorrow, which with each passing day, More expensive and bloodier...
...only on the two nights of January 18 and 19, the Islamic Republic committed the most terrible massacre in its 47-year history; A crime that was unbelievable for the world community. In response to the brutal reaction of the system, several hypotheses have been presented, all of which They are based on political-economic and geopolitical conditions. But none of these answers are able to explain how many times the quantity and intensity of the killings in January 1404 were compared to the protest movements of the previous years. The appropriate answer to this puzzle is also in A reminder of what the seed of the "Islamic Revolution" is. The Islamic Republic went crazy not because of the security threat, but because of the direct threat to its existence.
Javid Shah's slogan was a cry to turn the Iranian nation away from the struggle with modernity. The king here is not the real character of a particular person; If it was, logic dictated that a slogan like "Long live Omar Shah" should be shouted. "Javed Shah" translation of stability It is a thousand-year-old institution of the Iranian nation-state, which entered the modern era in the Pahlavi dynasty. This cry is the will of the nation to stop the derailed train of Iran, which is heading towards a terrible abyss. The goal is to return Iran to the path that In the Pahlavi era, it takes Iran towards modern state building, institutional concentration, development and connection with the new world.
In January, Javid Shah of the people was a rebuke to the Islamic Republic and to his other anti-modernist co-conspirators who, under the guise of the opposition, dream of continuing the war with the Iranian nation state. Unlike previous years, this time Iranians of the heart They targeted the Islamic Republic, and the helpless regime, in terror and maddened anger, recklessly and ruthlessly targeted and tore the hearts of tens of thousands of Iranians. But the will of the nation is not based on a few tens or even a few hundred thousand people to be stopped by killing. The nation has woken up from a 47-year-old sleep, torn the tight and ugly slavery of the nation, which they had forced, and has determined to return to the front.
Every land is a god; A God neither heavenly nor earthly, but a God who manifests in the nation and whose voice can only be heard from the mouths of the people.
The voice of the people, the voice of God
The voice of the people is the voice of God.
Mina Kamali
April 23, 2026
